Newsletter
Announcement of Amended Patent Examination Guidelines for Computer Software Related Inventions
|
The Intellectual Property
Office (IPO) announced on 20 May 2008 the
amended Patent Examination Guidelines for
Computer Software Related Inventions
(hereinafter referred to as "New
Guidelines"), which became effective on
the same day and applies to all the pending
patent applications covering software
inventions and patent applications to be
filed for software inventions.
The New Guidelines are based on the
relevant provisions of the Patent Law and
its Enforcement Rules, as well as the
chapters covering the general guidelines in
the Patent Examination Guidelines; relevant
examination guidelines adopted in the 1.
Adding New Section of "Definition of Computer
Software Related Inventions” The
section provides the definition of computer
software-related inventions and stipulates
that, in evaluation of whether a claimed
invention meets such definition, it is the
substantive contents rather than formality
of expression that should be considered, so
as to determine whether the claimed
invention's contribution to the prior art as
a whole has technicality.
The New Guidelines applies the
general criteria, on the basis of the
definition of the statutory invention, to
examine whether an invention is statutory
and whether its claims have patentability. 2.
Rearranging Section of "Non-Statutory Invention
Types" In
the New Guidelines, the non-statutory
invention types are exemplified in five
categories: "natural laws per se,"
"mere discovery," "inventions
against natural laws," "inventions
not utilizing natural rules," and
"non-technical concepts," in which
the non-technical concepts comprise
"mere information disclosure" and
"mere computer processing."
If an invention is a signal or a
computer program in a programming language,
it will also be considered mere information
disclosure which is of non-technical
concept. 3.
Specifying "Business Method Invention per se"
as "Not Utilizing Natural Rules" Business
methods are artificial rules such as social
rules, empirical rules, or economical rules,
so the business method per se does
not meet the definition of statutory
invention type.
4. Specifying New Allowable Invention Types as
"Computer Program Product,"
"Data Structure Product" and the
Like A
claim of computer software-related invention
normally may be an article claim or a
process claim.
Owing to popularity of computer
networks, computer software can not only be
stored in a tangible storage medium, but
also be transmitted and be accessed directly
through insubstantial networks without
having to be stored in a storage medium.
In this regard, it is necessary for
the article claim to cover an invention
which is defined as an article storing a
computer-readable program(s) regardless of
the type.
As a result, a computer program
product claim, a data structure product
claim and the like, in addition to the
currently allowable ordinary claims such as
a device, a system or a computer-readable
storage medium, are allowable and examined
on the basis of the substantive features in
the claims. 5. Adding New Section of “Means-plus-function Clauses
and Process-plus-function Clauses” The
section specifies the occasions of using
means-plus-function clauses, and evaluates
whether a claim is expressed in
means-plus-function clauses on the basis of
criteria which basically follow the 6.
Expanding the Section about "Industrial
Applicability," "Novelty,"
"Inventive Step" in Patentability
Requirements The
section differentiates the requirements for
industrial applicability from those for
sufficient disclosure of the specification
and invention implementation.
Further, the section specifies the
criteria for determining whether a
means-plus-function claim has novelty which
basically follow the MPEP of the USPTO. If
you have any questions or comments on the
New Guidelines, please feel free to contact
us. |